Quote:
Originally Posted by Dusty_Star
Thanks! I did not know that about her agent. What a mistake that would have been if 6:30 was removed. I agree with you, he was integral to the plot & also contributed to a lot of the laughs.
|
Yeah. She said her agent is a cat-person.
There is an exclusive edition now from B&N that includes endpapers with a chapter originally left out that has more about 6:30.
I just saw an article from the LA Times titled “Lessons in Chemistry: Five changes to the series from the book explained.” You can read it without subscribing — if it is your first article, I guess.
I wish they had not changed Harriet’s story. The original character is surviving an awful marriage and her story seemed to entwine better with the plot. The series’ Harriet’s story is an important one, historically, but I find it distracting from the original, closely knit storyline. But I guess we will see where this one goes.
It must be so hard for an author to relinquish control of the product of her brain, but I guess Apple bargained like they wanted to and, of course, this kind of success paid her well. Her name is on the credits as being part of the series input, but I don’t think she got everything she wanted………
Oh well, tough problem to have, huh.
Boomer