Quote:
Originally Posted by Maker
There was just an argument that golf balls that some person hit into a house is the homeowner's responsibility. Based upon the homeowner should expect such things to happen necause they are near a golf course.
For giggles, apply that argument to this thread. The injured person should assume all liability because the cart path was there first. Standing anywhere near a cart path could likely became a dangerous thing because there are so many carts being driven by old people with diminished skills.
Both of these are using the same logic. Either both are right, or both are wrong.
over\under = 200 posts
|
Just for giggles, apply this argument:
Florida laws regarding motor vehicle accidents are different from those governing a stray golf ball onto an adjacent property when the golf course was there first. Vastly different.