Quote:
Originally Posted by mtdjed
Without getting into details, I question POAs statement (Dec 2023) relative to a person's entitlement to restitution of wages, benefits, legal expenses, and job, based upon the Appellate Panel decision. Wasn't the perjury charge initiated after the removal for cause? And, also by the State.
Seems like the POA statement is akin to the POA article on Page 12 ( VHA / Daily Sun Attempt to Manipulate Readers (setting the record straight - again)
Perhaps next month POA will clarify.
|
I believe the removal was initiated after the charges were brought. The charges were the reason given for the removal.
I don't know the legal grounds for restitution and I suspect the POA does not either. The POA means well but they sometimes have a poor understanding of the facts.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|