Quote:
Originally Posted by tophcfa
Right, but since all the p & p’s are south of 44, shouldn’t the relative comparison be as a % of the holes south of 44? After all, this thread is about why are they building more of them. The relevancy of the question is all about where golf is being constructed, and it isn’t north of 44.
|
From another point of view: if you compare acreage, it looks like a P&P takes roughly 1/3 the area of An Exec
Maintenance cost is lower.
Throughput of golfers is faster.
P&P's keep golfers some would rather not see playing ahead of them off the other courses
Relative to the courses mentioned in the latest video, the P&P iappears to be something less than 5% of the land dedicated to golf.
There is a lot of land dedicated to golf South of the Turnpike.