So is the conceptual goal to force compliance versus punish violators?
Both require surveillance, one depends upon technology the other people. This appears to be an extension of technology use for labor reduction in the corporate world to the reduction of labor in the surveillance world, to force compliance.
The US legal system of innocent until proven guilty is a reactionary process, where forced compliance is a proactive process. The issue which many "proactive compliance dupes" forget is that all technology is crackable, by passable, and the attempts will again fail after a few years.
These attempts of control of the masses is how largely autocratic societies run by plutocrats come about. And many times, these are the seeds of proletariat revolution if you read enough history to understand human behaviors.
Right now, the marginal sociopaths / grifters / global technologists have gained a majority in large decision making positions. . and who knows how this situation will play out in the end. . whenever that end will be. .
good luck to us. . i fear it will get a lot worse before it gets better. .
|