Quote:
Originally Posted by kkingston57
Politely disagree and I was in the biz. Have relative who specializes in filing homeowners' claims. Person claimed he had roof damage and claimed that roof needed to be replaced ($8,000 roof) Insurance company investigated and believed that the claim was not covered. Homeowner hired my relative to file suit. Homeowner/attorney proved claim. Insurance company paid for the roof(8K plus interest)their attorney costs(about 50K) and homeowners attorney(200K). Laws have been changed but still favor the insured.
|
Seems like someone should reduce the attorney costs to something in line with the cost of the roof.