Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564
Right back at you.
I honestly don't know why it was removed. Seeing that it was removed in two steps, I assume it was because an influential individual purchased in that area and petitioned the developer to ease the restrictions for him. But, I really don't know.
The restrictions were not removed from "Fenney." The restrictions didn't cover "Fenney." The restrictions were removed from one unit within CDD12. In fact, that unit is not listed as Fenney but rather, it is listed as Southern Oaks (of which Fenney may be a part). However, there is another unit within CDD12 that had non-rental language added in an amendment. That unit is named Fenney in the deed restrictions.
|
Thanks for the correction. The removal still seems odd to me.