Quote:
Originally Posted by rustyp
If the developer has not enforced the rule which I will make the assumption they spent zero dollars on this subject. Now the CDD's are to enforce the rule which was/is the developer's responsibility. Any enforcement will involve legal fees. The CDDs are us. The added expense most likely will come out of the amenity fees. That could mean less executive golf course maintenance, less flowers, etc. The CDDs should not accept this proposal without a bucket of money from the developer to clean up their negligence. This has all the making of the Paradise Rec Center fiasco all over again.
|
Let's see:
- What rule was not enforced?
- The Developer has no responsibility to enforce any rule (check your deed restrictions)
- There *may* be additional legal fees
- Additional fees will NOT come out of amenity funds
-The CDD is *asking* for this additional authority
- What negligence?
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|