Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachKandSportsguy
wsj.com
Behind a paywall, i gave up my WSJ subscription for just cutting and usage. . apologies to those who like to turn people in for such. .
but copied from what I could read:
Cindy Picos was dropped by her home insurer last month. The reason: aerial photos of her roof, which her insurer refused to let her see.
Hmmm, they can also perform storm, hurricane and fraud claims reviews with the drone footages.
Technology good or not good? cost savings not passed onto consumers? claims denied with poor drone angle or conclusions from too far away?
Anyone know if any TV insurers doing this?
|
If she was
dropped by her home insurer because of a drone seeing damage, she should make a claim to the insurance company to fix the roof. Something is missing. I had a quote for insurance coverage this year from State Farm contingent upon an inspection. The inspector used a drone for the roof inspection and made a statement that the roof had five or more years of life. The inspection was submitted to State Farm and the underwriters rejected the home insurance. That is different than being dropped.