I'm curious, hypothetically speaking of course, if those of you who are opposed to any publically run health insurance plan took advantage of Medicare Part D- which represented a huge increase in unfunded programming for Medicare?

Is there personal responsibility to refuse to participate in government "giveaways" or do we only put the onus on the originator of the spending?

There are now plans to close the donut hole as well. Don't these two alterations to Medicare represent an attack on fiscal responsibility? And if so, shouldn't we be telling seniors to go back to spending their own money on their medications?