
06-17-2024, 08:18 AM
|
Veteran member
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 638
Thanks: 316
Thanked 314 Times in 107 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fdpaq0580
There have been complaints lodged about things that had been in place for months and even years. The Villages, according to some accounts, has even sold new homes which were out of compliance when released. If that were true, that particular issue should be grandfathered in along with all other issues that match said complaint. If something has been inplace for a reasonable amount of time, has not received previous complaints, is not illegal, a safety hazzard, does not extend beyond the property line, it should be grandfathered.
If your neighbor plants a palm, or puts stepping stones in their garden, or (God forbid) a little white cross where they buried the budgy in the flowerbed, the time to complain is right then, not two years down the road. Talk to your neighbor. If the issue can't be resolved, then, only the should you be allowed to file a complaint with ARC.
jmvho. í ½í¸‡âœŒï¸í ½í¶–
|
Simply if the VLS is selling homes out of compliance and then their complaint department is later filing a complaint to the new property owner for out of compliance, it seems to be a conflict of interest as far as i can see!
|