
11-20-2009, 08:57 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by djplong
1) remember, this was after the gop won the house. I remember the "undercounting" complaints but there was nothing as formal as, say, congressional hearings about it.
2) given the numbers i saw in my research, there's no way acorn could have been the prime contractor. There's just too many places to cover where acorn doesn't exist. Now, i *do* agree with you that acorn was being considered in many cities to be *a* major contractor. Easy to remember that since judd gregg is from my state so we heard a lot when he took his name out from being considered for that appointment.
|
and most importantly, it was not run from the White House as this WH want(s)(ed)
|