Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastskiguy
Yeah I'm sure that's right, the contract needs to give assignment of benefits in order for them to have a shot of getting paid if they can get money out of the insurance company.
But is there a downside for the homeowner? I can see a downside for the insurance company, the roof inspector/sales guy, and the attorney. But I'm missing where the homeowner gets screwed. Can anybody spell this out for me?
Joe
|
I've read that they charge an extremely high price to replace a roof. If the insurance company won't pay the full amount then the homeowner is responsible for the difference. In some cases it was more than the cost of replacing the roof with a legitimate company.