Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby
I've read it, I understand it. Someone who shows up trying to offer you a service - who you didn't call, invite, or otherwise authorize to show up - who doesn't have a license to show up...
is breaking the law. He has to be licensed. Not being licensed is a different law, not a trespassing law. So he is breaking the law by not being licensed to show up. That makes his presence - legally - trespassing.
|
Maybe this will make it easier 1. As to which notice against entering or remaining is given, either by actual communication to the offender or by posting, fencing, or cultivation as described in s. 810.011 Was there notice given against entering or remaining? Did the individual remain after notice was given? If not, then they are not violating the statute for trespassing.
As for licensing, did they have a license? Did anyone ask? Or, did a resident see some of "those" people in the area and immediately assume they were criminals and illegals?
Cautioning against a potential scam is great. Accusing others of being criminals based on, well, absolutely nothing is not so great.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
Last edited by Bill14564; 08-24-2024 at 02:41 PM.
|