Quote:
Originally Posted by dougjb
LOL !!
I got quite a laugh out of reading the initial posting in this thread. Why? Because it quotes figures from an unknown internet source. Anyone can make up numbers. I prefer to use the standard scientific method of basing my analysis on peer reviewed articles
|
Google exists and is easy to use. Here are some snippets found in seconds
...scientific publisher Wiley decided to shutter 19 scientific journals after retracting 11,300 sham papers.
When neuropsychologist Bernhard Sabel put his new fake-paper detector to work, he was “shocked” by what it found. After screening some 5000 papers, he estimates up to 34% of neuroscience papers published in 2020 were likely made up or plagiarized; in medicine, the figure was 24%.