Quote:
Originally Posted by Boomer
There are companies where perhaps a union is/was not needed. Many years ago I asked someone who worked in the manufacturing part of a huge, well-known company if they had a union. The response was, “We don’t need one.”
Also, said company made a lot of regular people very comfortable through profit-sharing. Can you imagine if companies like Walmart, for example, would have made profit-sharing available to ALL employees. Not only would there have been a lot of loyal employees on those cash registers, etc., just think of the learning experience that would have come from owning stock.
But a lot of companies plan to earn huge profits on the backs of employees and never consider how effective company stock all-around can be in moving a company forward with loyal employees. For companies that do not have stock, there are other ways to keep loyal employees and keep unions at bay. The employers’ choice to exploit is what brings in unions.
I am not saying all unions are perfect. But if unions are stomped into non-existence by those who have motives that risk our future overall economy, we will turn into another country.
This thread is going to turn into union-bashing. I can feel those wagons circling already.
Of course, most of those circling up will be the same people who expect teachers to devote their lives to working for basically nothing.
My point is — the middle class has been the backbone of our economy. Unions were instrumental in creating a strong middle class. If we lose our middle class, we are done. Unrestrained greed is bad economics.
Boomer, former union prez
|
Publix has given employees ownership since the very first store was opened. Even ******* get stock after a year as a bonus. Stock has made most very comfortable at retirement. Today employees or ex-employees own over 50% of the company. Must work there to buy Publix stock. Sell it and you sell it back to the Publix.