Quote:
Originally Posted by jimjamuser
All this stated confusion naturally brings up the question of National Health Insurance. Is the system used by Canada, Australia, and all other 1st world countries (except the US) superior to the US's confused and inefficient system? Answer, yes they get better care at lower cost. Ask the Canadians why they are afraid to get sick while in the US.
|
I lived in Canada for five years, and found it just the opposite. As a personal example, I was having what appeared to be heart problems, and failed a stress test. It took me about 4 months to get a heart scan and see the cardiologist. I also had back problems, and the doctor signed me up for pain management. About six months later, I returned to FL, and a couple months after that, I got a call from Alberta Healthcare saying they were ready for me to start my pain management (don't know how they got my FL telephone number). A co-worker's mother had a steel rod in her spine that snapped, leaving her humped over in terrible pain. It took her 1.5 years to get into pain management, which immediately (finally) solved her pain. The main hospital in Edmonton was overcrowded, had roof leaks that impacted their operating rooms, and long waiting lists (which were jumped by people with the right connections). Wealthy Canadians went to the U.S. to get treated. And free healthcare isn't free--income taxes were about double, to pay for it.