Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
And you don't think those two are related???????
Let's see----loss of habitat = LESS polar bears and therefore protected species
NO loss of habitat = MORE polar bears and hence permission to harvest.
Sorry, but once again the false climate change narrative doesn't stand up to simple logic
|
Sorry, but that misses a point. Loss of habitat = more encroachment on civilization = more permission to harvest (in the name of safety, of course)
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|