One thing I can't help notice is that none of those who say they care about the planet and the "people impacted" have not done research on what the optimal temperature is for the entire world population. Is it more important to save a donors beach house (dang, those concerned keep buying beach front property too....why?) than provide the most food and best climate for everyone?
Seems the efforts are more self serving than based on saving the planet. If you are concerned about climate change wouldn't you first determine the optimal temperature then defend or plan to never exceed that? At want temperature is the most food produced? What temperature has the most people living comfortably and using the least energy? Shouldn't those questions be answered by anyone claiming to want to "save the planet"?
|