Quote:
Originally Posted by JustSomeGuy
One thing I can't help notice is that none of those who say they care about the planet and the "people impacted" have not done research on what the optimal temperature is for the entire world population. Is it more important to save a donors beach house (dang, those concerned keep buying beach front property too....why?) than provide the most food and best climate for everyone?
Seems the efforts are more self serving than based on saving the planet. If you are concerned about climate change wouldn't you first determine the optimal temperature then defend or plan to never exceed that? At want temperature is the most food produced? What temperature has the most people living comfortably and using the least energy? Shouldn't those questions be answered by anyone claiming to want to "save the planet"?
|
Sorry, but that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. "Optimal temperature"???? Where??? When??? for what people?? There is no worldwide average temp that applies to different populations in different areas. Eskimo optimum is not Zulu optimum. Polar bear optimum is not Bengal tiger optimum. Optimum today is not optimum 65 million years ago. And averages mean nothing---you can drown in a lake with an average depth of 1/4 inch.