Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastskiguy
Yeah I'm sure that's right, the contract needs to give assignment of benefits in order for them to have a shot of getting paid if they can get money out of the insurance company.
But is there a downside for the homeowner? I can see a downside for the insurance company, the roof inspector/sales guy, and the attorney. But I'm missing where the homeowner gets screwed. Can anybody spell this out for me?
Joe
|
Was in the biz. The insurance company generally ends up paying at least 10-20% more than the market price of the roof and premiums will rise higher than if they were not involved,