[Aces4]

Originally Posted by CoachKandSportsguy

Yes, but I doubt a 10 year old book incited the murder. Murder is usually revenge for something very personal when there is no robbery and no mafia organized crime involved, which would be personal as well, sort of.

Most likely, and i am speculating, there was an insurance denial, and the loss of a loved one. With the highest denial rate in the industry, the angered pool of people is expected to be quite large. The rate may be as high as 30%, that's alot of people to disappoint.

The gunman was also not a professional, so pointing to personal versus business is most likely. However, if the shooter was black market hired, still unknown, the revengeful person had to avoid the black market squealers and FBI informants. Again, pointing to personal versus hired hitman.

The CEO was also potentially, hard data sources not published, under investigation for insider trading and monopolistic practices. I doubt the vengeful person knew that fact, as these are usually not public during the investigation. .

The post about the book was interesting given all the insurance denials here in TV, and FL, such that the reviews were positive in helping individuals fight the insurance companies. . the topic of insurance and corporate behaviors are all very similar. . . though most people in TV are struggling with hurricane damage recovery.

I would agree with your assessment if the gunman hadn't inscribed pretty much the title of the book on his bullets. Have you heard some of the other incendiary remarks by former WaPo reporter, Taylor Lorenz? We don't bother changing the laws and the system any longer, we just start shooting people.