Quote:
Originally Posted by Normal
It certainly could have been written as a general issue. Cannabis could have just been made legal. The tit for tat of usage, selling, growing, trading, gummies, smoking, etc. could all have just been covered as one legalization of the product. Instead the amendment had stipulations that made smoking it OK, but not growing it. What’s next, you can’t brew your own beer or make your own wine?
|
The amendment said no such thing.
The amendment authorized MMTCs to sell for personal use and the amendment authorized possession of small amounts for personal use.
The closest the amendment came to even mentioning restrictions on who can cultivate is with the language: The legislature may provide for the licensure of entities that are not Medical Marijuana Treatment Centers to acquire, cultivate, possess, process, transfer, transport, sell, and distribute marijuana products and marijuana accessories for personal use by adults. This language makes it clear the amendment DOES NOT prohibit growing for personal use but acknowledges that it is up to the legislature to allow it.
I really wish people would try to understand what they are voting for rather than just taking the word of some talking head who was paid to mislead them.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|