Quote:
Originally Posted by JMintzer
Yet you thought it mentioned "stepping into the grass (it didn't...)
The 2nd post you quoted was much later in the thread.
But nice try... You failed, but at least you tried...
|
?? Try harder.
My response that you took exception to was made to the 2nd post I quoted. Yes, it was much farther down in the thread and was apparently written without having read the original post first.
I couldn’t care less about stepping into the grass, that was completely irrelevant (you might note that I avoided highlighting that section). The post I responded to (the response you took exception to) assumed that the OP needs to be told to walk facing oncoming traffic. Great advice but the original post clearly stated the OP *was* walking facing oncoming traffic. The poster would have known that if he had read the original post.
Does that make it easier for you to understand?
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|