
01-21-2025, 02:28 PM
|
Sage
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 19,762
Thanks: 13
Thanked 6,126 Times in 2,723 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99
So on the subject of Amenities, here's the question that always pops into my mind.
Does the Developer have the unlimited right to add residences, who will all have unlimited rights to all the existing amenities, regardless of where they're located?
IF the Developer opted to stop building Recreational Centers, can he still keep adding homes, which have unlimited rights to the already constructed Recreational Centers & Pools?
IF the Developer opted to stop building Executive Golfs courses, do the folks in those newer villages (presumably South), have the unlimited right to inundate the existing Executive Courses in the North?
Does the Developer have the unequivocal right to decide how many Executive Golf courses, pools, recreational centers, etc., are needed to serve a given population?
As near as I can see, there's no obligation for the Developer to provide "x number of Executive Golf course holes, per x number of residences" ... nor any obligation to do the same with Recreational Centers or any other amenity. It seems he's the sole judge of what's necessary or fair?
Amy I missing something, besides the obvious that some things are "market driven".
|
Sure seems obvious after reading a couple posts after this one or was this just a little trolling………
__________________
The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell.
“Only truth and transparency can guarantee freedom”, John McCain
|