Quote:
Originally Posted by FloridaGuy66
Least consistent manufactured ball isn't the same as lowest quality ball. Most balls scored quite well compared to ones at the same price point.
.
|
The most important criteria for a golf ball, is consistency. If a ball's consistency is rated at the bottom of the barrel, the quality of the ball is in the same place. The "lease consistent manufactured ball", is by definition, the "lowest quality (performing) ball".
You either misread the facts or read a different report: (
Just a moment...)
"The Costco golf ball is not worth your money. Honestly, I hate to be the one to tell you this, but your membership is probably better used on a rental car discount, a couple gallons of Mayo, or even their four pack of gloves.
After we ran these through our quality ball lab, the KSig scored a whopping 45 out of a hundred on the chart.
That’s the third lowest scoring ball in all of MyGolfSpy history. And we’ve been at this for a while. Compression scored 93 out of a hundred on the scale. Which is actually a little bit firmer than your regular Pro V1. And not to mention The Kirkland Signature golf ball, it’s one of the spinniest balls, yes that’s a word, that we’ve ever tested. And I mean ever.
Look, I totally get it. You’re on the hunt for a deal. I would be too.
But it’s hard for me to recommend the Kirkland ball to really anybody, scoring 45 out of 100 on the scale. So if you want to avoid losing anywhere from 6 to 10 strokes on your game, or, who knows, possibly slicing the s*** out of the ball, I’d avoid the Kirkland altogether."