[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by Normal

Way out from left field. There are also a group of us who remember there would be “no development “ south of 466. To make the case that rentals are for the case of continuing expansion and destruction of the rural life is a positive? That’s just mind blowing? Well I guess not, if you want to sell homes here.



This is of course besides of which, no one is banning them, they may still be around, it will just cost you a lot more to put your neighbors out with your mini hotel business.

If you moved here for a rural lifestyle then you did not do your homework. With five lots per acre this is suburban at best. Who cares if they are building below 466 or below 44 or even below 470? You bought into a packed neighborhood and that has not changed.

You moved to a busy area, a growing area, and an area which advertised a very active lifestyle. To complain now that you see a lot of people you don’t recognize is ridiculous.