Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99
You're 100% right and this is where the discussion gets interesting.
People are fond of saying, an "The Assessor has no right to come into your home". That's usually an accurate characterization. So instead, folks want to make aerial observation, acceptable?
|
Fine with me; I expect that is happening already.
Quote:
In many states, Environmental agencies are not allowed to "trespass". As I've been told by various Environmental agencies, "we can take aerial photos of your property", if we can't see an area from your property lines.
So my question remains. Are all the folks supporting the drone operators, going to be similarly supportive of the Developer/CDD's, using aerial photography to enforce Deed Restrictions? I think not.
|
Fine with me too. However, the Developer and CDDs do not file the complaints or investigate the complaints.
Quote:
What about if the so-called "trolls" who wander neighborhoods, looking for non-compliant homes, decide to implement drone searches? Are you all good with that?
|
Yep, still fine with me. Disagree with the actions of the mythical trolls but similarly disagree with the actions of werewolves and leprechauns.
As we are not allowed to have privacy fences I have a hard time thinking of a situation where a drone would be needed to find a violation.
Quote:
What about using aerial photography & face recognition, to insure only residents are using the swimming pools? Does everyone agree with that approach?
|
The technology is not mature enough and using a drone rather than a fixed camera would be wasteful.
Quote:
How about drone surveillance, to insure compliance with the dress code at golf courses?
|
There aren't enough dress police already??
...
Quote:
Orwell's Big Brother of 1984. The nose is under the camel's tent, folks.
|
Feels like a bit of a stretch.