Quote:
Originally Posted by Laker14
My suspicion is that The Developer would like to have 100% control of all information disseminated to the public, for reasons mentioned in previous posts. It's what they've always had, and it's what they've always done, and it's how they'd like it to remain. It's understandable that's what they want.
It's predictable that they'd wield their financial might via legal actions to get what they want. Whether they are actually correct in their legal posturing is probably never going to get to the point of a legal decision, because the droners simply won't have the money to match The Developer's.
Too bad, because I think it would make for interesting theatre to see if a well compensated legal team could force a distinction between The Developer's "right to privacy", and its "wish for secrecy".
|
I pretty much agree with you. My only caveat is that there is no "right to privacy," only a legal "reasonable expectation of privacy." Question is, in this circumstance, does the Developer have a "REASONABLE expectation of privacy?
__________________
Chino 1960's to 1976, Torrance, CA 1976-1983, 87-91, 94-98 / Frederick Co., MD 1983-1987/ Valencia, CA 1991-1994/ Brea, CA 1998-2002/ Dana Point, CA 2002-2019/ Knoxville, TN 2019-Current/ FL 2022-Current
|