RSHOFFER..Thanks for adding to the background on the problem. I have intentionally not identified the "source" as that is not important. What is important is the accuracy. It is up to the nay sayers to read the facts and then "factually" challenge it if is wrong. Identifying source's only allows for one more avenue for the nay sayers to attack the messenger without knowledge. Hopefully they will do their homework, be unbais in their analysis and add to the discussion with intellegence and not political leaning nor
generally negative attitudes. Again, thanks for constructive input.