
04-11-2025, 07:25 AM
|
Gold member
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,124
Thanks: 2,707
Thanked 851 Times in 412 Posts
|
|
No good deed goes unpunished:
I n short, coming out of the Second World War, the whole focus for the US innovation system was on early-stage R&D, not manufacturing. “Production was the last thing we worried about, since we were the king. Nobody was remotely close to us,” adds Bonvillian.
By resting on its laurels, therefore, the US lost its lead. Meanwhile, post-war Germany and Japan were rapidly rebuilding their industrial bases to counter mass unemployment. This meant their innovation systems were focused on manufacturing, leading to the creation of Germany’s much-vaunted Fraunhofer model (industry and universities working hand in hand) and Japan’s quality production revolution. These were dramatic innovations in the production process, much of which were funded, ironically, by US post-war reconstruction money, such as the Marshall Plan.
Investigating the Decline: Who Killed US Manufacturing
Ridiculous union demands were also a major factor. But relocation to right to work states would have been the solution. Overtime, the ballooning trade deficits will negate the benefits of cheaper imports. But of course short term profits are always the highest priority.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ithos For This Useful Post:
|
|
|