Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugchief
Props to you for at least trying to document.
The first link appears to be a one-off.
The other two are on visas and are troublemaking activists. They are at here at the pleasure of the State Dept which has the unilateral choice to remove them. You may think they should be allowed to stay, but I don't. Visas are a privilege, not a right.
|
One off in what way?
Troublemaking activists? Can you provide examples of that "troublemaking" that is not protected by the Constitution?
I believe everyone in this country is protected by our laws. Period.
I believe everyone in this country legally has all the rights guaranteed by our Constitution. Period.
Should these three be allowed to stay? That is not the question at all. The question is, have they violated the agreement that granted them legal status to stay? That is something that is determined in a court, NOT the way it has played out so far.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|