Quote:
Originally Posted by Normal
Nor does it change the fact that the legislation will be signed into law.
|
Ahh, back to the topic.
1. The House version does not contain the "reasonable means" language
2. The Senate analysis notes technical deficiencies with that language
3. The two version will need to be reconciled
4. My (rather faulty) crystal ball says it will be easiest to remove the faulty language
5. EVEN IF IT PASSES with the language intact, it will STILL be illegal to shoot at a drone (FAA, Florida) or to jam an RF signal (FCC)
So sure, what you said.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
Last edited by Bill14564; 04-23-2025 at 02:26 PM.
|