Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564
We can discuss any number of things but this thread is about the use of (or preventing use of) Villages facilities.
And yes, I would be completely comfortable with that situation. It would be odd since our pool is rarely empty, I would likely be with her, and I haven't seen a teenager in the area in quite a while, but I would be comfortable.
One might wonder where that example of 4 teenage males in a neighborhood pool came from (other than the same thought process that somehow connected the topic of facilities with food prices). I don't believe any of the comments on here mentioned 4 teenage males in a neighborhood pool happening. She and I *have* discussed the situation mentioned in this thread, workers using the restroom, and we both agree this concern says more about the fearful woman than it does about the use of the restrooms.
|
I think that the "commune" mentality of a few indicates they may be better off in a public living situation which absolutely provides for the exposure to every and any situation when using public facilities.
The Villages is a pay for use community with definite limitations and I don't understand why that is so difficult for some to grasp. If one wants to live with the public facilities and access, it is readily available but why choose a pay for use community at that point and try to make it public?
There are options for everyone but moving into a restricted community and then trying to rewrite the rules is ridiculous.
