Of all the statements on this board concerning this subject, I find this one the most frightening! The source is not important??? Since when?

I, for one, would love an answer to that question before I would even consider looking into this. My husband just went to the cardiologist without receiving any such notification.

Take it from me, "the source" is always the most important, the cornerstone of deciphering how credible any "alleged" fact is.

I feel a Glenn Beck moment coming on....sniff.... sniff.... (Oh! That's right! He was the guy who said "He was not a journalist, just a commentator and didn't have to have the facts."