So, I see there is a lot of spinning-out on this thread. The common denominator appears to be coming from the discomfort of some commenters in being unable to answer valid questions. So unsupported claims are made (#51 is a doozy), conjured accusations are made about the viewpoints of strangers (#52 is off on a bender with that. Btw, incorrect - it is very much THE SCIENCE that some of us want and when big pharma is funding their own "science", we aren't getting it) and an overall devolution into semi-hysterics follows.
All of that occurs ^^^ because of the lack of being able to back-up unsupported claims - most which are probably simply repeats coming from TV media. That should cause people to pause, to question themselves about why they don't require solid, objective data before simply taking, or advocating others take, any type of medicine. Perhaps it's an unconscious response in realizing the Covid injections weren't vaccines at all. They neither prevent acquiring the disease nor the transmitting of it. In fact, vast numbers of people who took them proceeded to get horrendous bouts of Covid. Very strange and unsettling, that is.
I'll pose two more important questions (that will likely go unanswered)
For those that simply believe vaccines are miracle drugs that work and have no risk:
-- Why would you care whether someone else declines to take them? If you have and believe you are protected that should be enough for you. Why is it not?
-- If they are safe, why have vaccine manufacturers had immunity from liability for decades? What other huge industry has such protection? Why does big pharma have it for that class of drugs?
|