Well, no, that is not how it works. The precipitation forecasts are presented as probability functions. The prognostications of many complex events are presented as probability functions. What actual data are you referring to? If it is model data then that is readily available but you won't be able to interpret it correctly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by retiredguy123
I can understand weather forcasters making mistakes about their forecasts for rain. But, to me, it is unacceptable for them to consistently predict rain that almost never happens. Obviously, they are deliberating distorting the data to make it look like rain will occur when they know they are wrong more often than not. Why not just present the actual data?
|