Quote:
Originally Posted by opinionist
We would not have a spending problem if the Constitution's explicit restrictions on government power were respected. Judges have ruled that anything deemed to be "necessary and proper" can ignore those explicit restrictions without a Constitutional amendment. There was a reason the explicit restrictions existed, and the violations were never "necessary and proper."
|
Out of curiosity, what are the explicit restrictions and what is an example of a current Govt. program/spending which violates those explicit restrictions and is therefore unconstitutional?
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|