Quote:
Originally Posted by C. C. Rider
None of the referenced links that I read compared the cost difference in a warm climate such as Florida. So, using my all electric home as an example, let's do some "back of the envelope" figuring.
Let's say that a house with ALL double-pane windows costs an extra $6,000 here in Florida. Now, again using my heating/cooling costs as an example, let's say that my monthly electric bill in my ALL ELECTRIC home was reduced about $30 per month if I had all double-pane windows.
OK, so $30 per month equals $360 per year. At that rate, it would take 16.7 years just to break even. I don't know about you, but if someone offered me $6,000 CASH TODAY or $30 per month for the next 16.7 years, I'm going to take the $6,000 CASH TODAY!
Further, if you studied economics and the "time value of money", you'll know that dollars "saved" at some point in the future aren't worth nearly as much as dollars saved TODAY. So, if we factored that into our "break even" point above, it would take MUCH longer to break even than 16.7 years.
.
|
First, I'm confused by your response. The OP was talking about the windows in their Lanai not the whole house. I don't believe the price difference between single and double pane windows in a closed in lanai is as much as you are stating. You also have to realize the heat gain is significant because the lanai is a glass enclosed room. Way different that a window in an insulated wall.
But If you are not going to spend the extra money on double pane windows then why even spend money insulating the lanai ceiling? According to your calculations it's not worth it.