Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
Not yet, time will tell. What if most of the $361M was coded by UHC and not TVH???
|
ohhh, that is an interesting scenario!
One I hadn't thought about . . . .
and how TVH can fall into the pattern of its the accepted insurance reimbursement practice!
so who then gets the plausible deniability?
financial collusion for a shared financial outcome. .
like the recent posting example of the dentist coding the crown wrong, so that the patient would pay more so that everyone is more profitable. . unless you fight it.
I think that is covered in the Freakonomics book discussing behavioral economics, in the chapter about professional sumo wrestlers throwing matches for the shared financial benefit of all wrestlers. .