
07-30-2025, 12:49 PM
|
Sage
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NJ, NM, SC, PA, DC, MD, VA, NY, CA, ID and finally FL.
Posts: 7,883
Thanks: 14,350
Thanked 5,111 Times in 1,957 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby
Not sure what numbers you're looking at, but here's mine (rounded):
Between my payroll deduction and employer contribution, I've paid in just under $60,000 in social security taxes.
I'm getting $40 more per month in social security payments than I did when I started getting them, just 1.5 years ago. I anticipate around $20 more per month for 2026. Regardless:
At the current total of my social security checks, I will have received 100% of what I put in, and what my employer put in, by the 7th year of collecting social security checks. I won't even be 70 years old yet, at that point, because I started getting them when I was 62.
This means that all the checks I receive after I turn 70, will be "in addition" to what I/my employer paid in. If I live to be 90, that'll mean 100% of what I get post 70-years-old will be "profit." I dunno - seems like a pretty good deal to me. Get a 100% return on your initial investment in 7 years after the start of the payout, and then keep getting steady monthly checks for the next 20 (or more) years.
|
This narrative totally ignores the time value of money and the interest, dividends and capital gains one can obtain over the years. It is similar to pitches I used to hear from whole life insurance salesmen 50 years ago.
__________________
"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth." Plato
“To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.” Thomas Paine
|
The Following User Says Thank You to manaboutown For This Useful Post:
|
|
|