Quote:
Originally Posted by Worldseries27
so a naming ceremony 600 years ago attended by a few invading and murderous conquistadores supercedes the right of an american president to rename our own territorial waters to honor our nation? I don't think so . That privilege was earned for the president by the sacrifices of our nation's dead and wounded in the cause of world peace.
The U S. Navy has fought and won in 2 world wars and today it's 16 ballistic missile submarines patrol the world's oceans with their over 2500 strategic nuclear warheads to keep the world free and safe from evil people. America has been called the arsenal of democracy, not mexico
america has lost patriots in ww1, 2, korea, vietnam, gulf and iraq wars
not mexico
america has lost over 72,135 american naval personnel in ww2 fighting for freedom on the world's seas
not mexico
even today america's navy patrols the oceans to preserve the right of navigation for all countries to sail upon
not mexico
the blood and sacrifice of us navy patriots alone justifies the presidents order to rename the gulf to honor american exceptionalism.
The order to rename it the gulf of america is in effect for all U S. Citizens even those who don't like it.
You can have a watch party for 250 years if you so desire as history dustbin awaits.
I'll party now
|
Nice story BUT, as we all know the name came from someone who was definitely NOT a veteran.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|