|
08-09-2025, 08:16 PM
|
Sage
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 15,303
Thanks: 7,682
Thanked 6,316 Times in 3,269 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99
You can manipulate the facts and the situation all you want, but the bank absolutely did the right thing and they had no choice, per Banking Regulations.
The OP/Depositor intentionally tried to obscure his address and therefore, his identify. He also presented a Bank/Certified Check, which is another red flag. Any credible bank would have done the exact same thing, because they have no choice.
Don't believe it? Go get a Bank Check for $100,000 and try to deposit the check at another bank ... ask them "how long before I can have access to the money I'm depositing"? (Or just see the attached, so you understand the regulations.
Now complicate the situation, by the presenter of the check, using a non-verifiable address.
|
So what saying they can hold his money hostage. Funny when I own bank they want money now address or not.
|