Quote:
Originally Posted by LianneMigiano
Can someone explain to me WHO dreamed up the DIFFERENT DEED REQUIREMENTS for EACH village? Whose ideas were they in the first place? Initial purpose? Logic behind each? Need to do so? Benefit of such distinctions over the years? Statistical analysis of the continuance of any unsubstantiated need to continue REQUIREMENT of any arbitrary restriction? (i.e. requirements such as one exterior/trim paint (or roof) color for 100+ neighborhood homes? Stones v. grass? Live grass vs. artificial turf? Painted driveways vs. not allowed? There are probably dozens of other variations of DEED REQUIREMENTS that also have NO BASIS in fact for continuance - BUT THE EMPORER HAS NO CLOTHES!
|
It's completely the opposite. The Emperor who has no clothes, are those who don't understand and question the need for the (generally) well thought out and necessary Deed Restrictions.
There are no Deed Restrictions that are arbitrary, illogical, or without a basis in sound reasoning. The obvious goal, as is the goal of any zoning, HOA or neighborhood regulations, is to preserve the original intent of the neighborhood and protect residents from those who think they have the right to do whatever they want to do, regardless of their neighbors' opinions.
If someone wants to live somewhere without zoning, land use regulations or community standards, there are areas of the country (& Florida), where that's close to possible. Perhaps somewhere like that would be a better place for those folks to live.