Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
No problem, she would just need to be at over 250 different amenities all at the same time, all day long (or hire 250 people). Then, without any authority whatsoever, ask to see IDs of everyone entering, while watching for fence climbers out of view. Not sure how she would handle anyone who "just says no" to her request. Don't forget to bring a golf cart so she can chase down everyone on the golf courses and ask for ID.
Might want to rethink that "suggestion"
|
I'm not sure it's a bad suggestion. Assertions are being made that imply knowledge of what is happening at 250 amenities, all at the same time, all day long. If the assertions are correct then the proof should be very easy to acquire. On the other hand, if it is difficult to prove that 250 different amenities are being overrun all day long then there might be a reason for that.
I would like to see something beyond an all-or-nothing approach. My pool is not being overrun, my pool does not need any additional money spent on enforcement. My pool is just one of many and may very well be atypical. It would be nice to see increased attention spent at certain pools/amenities that are known to have issues. Maybe a way could be found to fund something like that.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|