Quote:
Originally Posted by G.R.I.T.S.
It was customer backlash not “conservative.”
|
I doubt that very much but there is no way to prove it.
- Hard to know the leanings of those who sold the stock
- Hard to know whether the stock was sold in retaliation for the logo or in anticipation of a drop followed by a rebound
- Don't know if the signs had changed on a significant number of stores; those driving up and down I95 (the customers) may have had no idea at all the controversy was happening
- Ten days of sales doesn't seem like long enough to draw any conclusions
The claimed reason for changing the logo was valid - it will be more recognizable for poor eyes and on small screens. I don't recall reading any reason for the outcry other than, "they changed something!" Honestly seems like the second manufactured controversy in two months, more like an attempt at a distraction.