I appreciate the opportunity to contribute to the discussion on ASL (American Sign Language) interpreters within this forum (see
sign language ) and would like to offer some clarification regarding accessibility and inclusion.
It is important to recognize that ASL interpretation involves trained professionals who provide real-time linguistic services, rather than relying solely on captions or slides. While captions can enhance understanding, they do not fully replicate the nuance, emotion, and immediacy provided by live interpretation. Equating written captions with live sign language interpretation is akin to telling a hearing person to "just read the transcript" instead of attending a lecture in person.
Furthermore, interpreters are highly skilled professionals who deserve appropriate compensation, similar to other essential service providers such as medical staff, educators, or speakers at events. Relying exclusively on volunteers can result in inconsistent access and may unintentionally hinder full engagement for Deaf participants.
Additionally, the assumption that “Deaf people can just read” overlooks that ASL is a distinct language with its own grammar, idioms, and cultural significance. Many Deaf individuals, particularly those who were raised signing, process information more naturally through ASL than through written English. Therefore, captions or handouts should complement, not replace, live interpretation—especially during interactive sessions, Q&A periods, or presentations that involve nuance and emotional expression.
Providing ASL interpreters is not about giving special treatment; it is about ensuring equal access. It enables Deaf residents to participate fully, ask questions, and connect with others on an equal footing. In our community, where inclusivity and dignity are valued, access to interpretation services should be viewed as a fundamental element of fairness and respect.