Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99
You can keep saying the same thing over and over, it will still be wrong.
When you bought in The Villages, you bought a home with Deed Restrictions. The District was not a party to that transaction.
There is nothing inherently illegal about Deed Restrictions, provided they don't discriminate agains a protected class. Private transactions are not protected by the 1st Amendment, nor are "signs" protected by the 1st Amendment. If signs were protected by the 1st Amendment, cities and towns wouldn't be able to adopt sign regulations. The 1st Amendment is the Right of Free Speech ... it is not "The Right to Post and/or Carry Signs".
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by billlaur
You should read the 1st amendment there are 5 elements to it….
|
I'm sorry my friend, but you obviously don't understand law nor the 1st Amendment.
There are (5) RIGHTS protected by the 1st amendment. None of those "rights" include an unlimited "right to post signage". nor is there anything in the 1st Amendment which prohibits Deed Restrictions.
__________________
"God made me and gave me the right to remain silent, but not the ability." Sen John Kennedy (R-La)
" ... and that Norm, is why some folks always feel smarter, when they sign onto TOTV after a few beers" adapted from Cliff Claven, 1/18/90
|