
09-06-2025, 02:22 PM
|
Sage
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: The Villages
Posts: 13,922
Thanks: 1,470
Thanked 15,002 Times in 5,009 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99
I don't need to do that. I deal with this stuff for a living and have a very good understanding of how it works.
Unlike many on this thread, i don't have to run to Google and decide what my opinion or position is.
You apparently have little or no experience with real estate property rights, because your conclusion is dead wrong. I can sell a parcel of land, with a restriction that "No Billboards" be erected. What I can't do, is sell a parcel of land and prohibit only billboards that attack LBGQT folks. Sometimes you don't have to run to AI to get a Constitutional question answered, one can sometimes rely on simply common sense.
Also, if you're going to quote the Supreme Court's decision in Reed, you perhaps should read it again. The Decision says that signs absolutely can be regulated by government, provided regulations are "content neutral". The Decision says sign regulations cannot be based on message or subject (content).
|
So once again, welcome to TOTV, where amateurs argue with experts. I feel your pain.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to golfing eagles For This Useful Post:
|
|
|