Quote:
Originally Posted by Maker
The ruling says that blanket restrictions against signs are unconstitutional. Content neutral is only part of the ruling. Also says no random arbitrary restrictions are allowed. Your example would not float.
It shows that you "don't need to read the decision" yet are pontificating it incorrectly. I guess you know it all and there is no reasoning possible because you continue to advocate an opinion that is contradicted in the actual examples SCOTUS published.
|
The Developer & The Villages spend millions of dollars a year on legal fees. They continue to sell 1000's of homes every year, with Deed Restrictions.
The Developers (Uihlein family) of Lakewood Ranch in Sarasota, sell even more, all with Deed Restrictions.
It makes me wonder why the Morse's & Uihlein family spend millions on attorneys, when the answers are right here on ToTV.
"No More Deed Restrictions, per ToTV".